Every day spent at the university – attending seminars or preraring for them – is in a way a day with learning theories. I use them in my practical learning process. I use them when teaching (this means supporting my kids in their school issues for the time being).
Yesterday, trying to think about the particular theories involved, observing my own learning and the way I practice learning with my children, I had to admit that almost the only theory I use is behaviorism. The old, traditional methods of learning are the ones I was confronted with in my school days, and the ones that drilled for a long time are very hard to verify.
Unforunataly my knowledge of the more recent and possibly more effective (as related by the scholars) theories of learning take a lot of time to be innerly accepted and practically applicable. Sometimes I wish there were courses preparing the sudents to work according to the different learning methods, where the practical bennefits and drawbacks could be shown. Of course, I know that this is to be taught in the gymnasium, but the theories and thus practical methods change so quickly. It is a pity not to have an access to the development in this field once you are out of school.
In my learning, based practically on theoretical recognitions of behaviorism my knowledge has to be imprinted in my mind, which serves as a kind of archive units container. My learning aim is to gather as much of information in my mind’s safe as possible. This is probably the root of the very negative frustration about my learning process: the evidence of the possibilities of my mind’s storage is far from satisfying! My educational means and sources, e.g., books, learning media, classroom activities, are in the so arranged process of learning, authorities I take for granted. There is, of course, an element of my own reflection, yet my own judgement and criticism are not primary in aquiring my knowledge. I rely to a great extent on the authority of the external material I’m confronted with.
Constructivist learning, for a change, would be marked by extended practicing of one’s own judging critical skills of external sources. Competence in relying on own inner sense of validity of educational material makes carrying an extensive encyclopedia in your mind redundant. You don’t have to contain all knowledge if you can properly judge the particular situation and know where to look for the details. Thus, learning is more effective, according to conscructionalists, when the learner is allowed to create his own world of knowledge, marked by his own connections between the elements. The learning aim is here to set the connections in the mind, or to become aware of them, instead of jamming knowledge in the brain box. The teaching/learning material is viewed only as raw material, the instructor is not an unshakable authority, but an accompanying coach to help over major difficulties. The feedback he gives is not to provide the learner with the external information, but to better the regulation process of his inner transformations (or creations).
So far the theory. I’m inclined to believe that it works once you’ve got the methods running. Yet there is time necessary to get the new method running, which I personally do not have. Possibly it is short sighted not to invest time in the rearrangement of learning – but… I’m chairing a seminar session tommorow and there’s still work to be done about it: schemes, details, information in reserve. Then there are only 5 weeks to write some seminar papers, and a lot of reading stuff bound to it, too! I’d love to learn more effectively, but how do I push the learning of more effective learning in the tight time schedule yet?
Well, bye bye – till tommorow! Off I am for the next seminar… hopefully setting some staying connections in my mind…
P.S. writing off this blog entry took two hours time…